It seems like there’s a significant debate brewing among fans and analysts regarding who should take the final shot for the Boston Celtics in crucial moments. The recent game against the Cleveland Cavaliers has only intensified this discussion.

While Jayson Tatum has undoubtedly proven himself as one of the league’s premier players and a go-to option in clutch situations, there are valid arguments suggesting that the Celtics’ wealth of talent should be utilized strategically, particularly in the regular season.

In the game against the Cavaliers, despite Tatum’s prowess, it was Kristaps Porzingis who emerged as a key contributor down the stretch, playing a pivotal role in keeping the Celtics competitive. With Tatum struggling in the second half and Porzingis finding his rhythm, some argue that the final shot should have been entrusted to the hot hand.

The decision-making process surrounding the final shot is complex, especially when considering factors such as individual performance throughout the game and the dynamics of the team. While Tatum’s attempt nearly found the mark, there’s a sentiment that a more dynamic offensive approach could have been employed, utilizing the strengths of other players like Porzingis or Jaylen Brown.

In hindsight, there’s acknowledgment from Tatum himself that a quicker decision-making process may have been beneficial. With ample time on the clock, the Celtics had the opportunity to orchestrate a more intricate offensive set, potentially involving multiple players and creating additional scoring opportunities.

Ultimately, while Tatum remains a formidable option in clutch situations, there’s room for strategic adjustments in how the Celtics approach late-game scenarios, especially considering the depth of talent on their roster.

As the season progresses, it’ll be interesting to see how the team navigates these critical moments and optimizes their offensive execution for maximum effectiveness.